Changing Roles of Public Education
One of the most important social developments that helped to make
possible a shift in thinking about the role of public education was the
effect of the baby boom of the 1950's and
1960's on the schools. In the 1920's, but especially in the Depression
conditions of the 1930's, the United States experienced a declining birth
rate -- every thousand women aged fifteen to forty-four gave birth to about
118 live children in 1920,89.2 in 1930,75.8 in 1936, and 80 in
1940. With the growing prosperity brought on by the Second World War and
the economic boom that followed it young people married and established
households earlier and began to raise larger families than had their
predecessors during the Depression. Birth rates rose to 102 per thousand
in 1946, 106.2 in 1950, and 118 in 1955. Although economics was probably
the most important determinant, it is not the only explanation for the
baby boom. The increased value placed on the idea of the family also helps
to explain this rise in birth rates. The baby boomers began streaming into
the first grade by the mid 1940's and became a flood by 1950. The public
school system suddenly found itself overtaxed. While the number of
schoolchildren rose because of wartime and postwar conditions, these same
conditions made the schools even less prepared to cope with the flood. The
wartime economy meant that few new schools were built between 1940 and
1945. Moreover, during the war and in the boom times that followed, large
numbers of teachers left their profession for better-paying jobs elsewhere
in the economy.
Therefore in the 1950's and 1960's, the baby boom hit an antiquated and
inadequate school system. Consequently, the "custodial rhetoric"of the
1930's and early 1940's no longer made sense that is, keeping youths aged
sixteen and older out of the labor market by keeping them in school could
no longer be a high priority for an institution unable to find space
and staff to teach younger children aged five to sixteen. With the baby
boom, the focus of educators and of laymen interested in education
inevitably turned toward the lower grades and back to basic academic
skills and discipline. The system no longer had much interest in offering
nontraditional, new, and extra services to older youths.